Argumenti “za i protiv” inkluzije
Univerzitet u Tuzli
Edukacijsko-rehabilitacijski fakultet
Predmet: Inkluzivna praksa
Seminarski rad
Tema: Argumenti za i protiv integracije
Predmetni nastavnik:
Dr.sc. Medina Vantić -Tanjić, vanr. prof. Studenti:
Gorica Kurtuma 9
/
16 S
Ivana Klještan 30
/16 S
Tuzla, decembar 2016.
2
SADRŽAJ
1. SEGREGACIJA – INTEGRACIJA – INKLUZIJA.........................................6
2.1. ARGUMENTI ZA INTEGRACIJU............................................................9
2.2. ARGUMENTI PROTIV INTEGRACIJE.................................................10
3. HUMANE PRETPOSTAVKE ŠKOLSKE INKLUZIJE ZA DJECU SA
POSEBNIM POTREBAMA...............................................................................11

4
SUMMARY
In this seminary work on colorful way have been described next words: segregation,
integralion an inclusion. Some important thins are leaded for every process, and it is schowed
how terminology has been developing and with her educationally system for normal kids, but
also for kids with special needs. Through the display of arguments which goes in a favour of
integralion process, and for those who give explanation why this process isn`t the best
solution in which specifical needs children with special needs can satisfy on good way, and
their other powers can`t reach their maximus.
Important words:
Special needs - is need which children with special needs have in the way of functioning in
life.
Segregation- lefting out one person for special criteriums.
Integration- filting in educational way and it means „ going to school“.
Inclusion- lithing, not being left out, it means „ participatin in school“.
Argument- sentence which is being used for excuse.
Ovaj materijal je namenjen za učenje i pripremu, ne za predaju.
Slični dokumenti